Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Retain biological legacies

Approach

In urban areas, pre-urban legacy trees often provide much of the ecosystem services and functional value (e.g., carbon storage, shading, and habitat) of the urban forest (Fahey et al. 2012). Preservation of these features will be essential to adapting the urban forest to future climates, because old trees may have superior genetics and they may play a valuable role in helping species persist on the landscape (Gunn 2009). Tactics for urban areas may differ from those used in rural forests managed for timber because there is rarely pressure to harvest or salvage in urban areas. However, legacy retention is often difficult or impossible because of development pressure. Despite the challenge, the retention of legacy trees can be helpful to promote the habitat value that these features provide.

Tactics

  • Urban natural areas: Retaining snags and downed trees whenever possible (i.e. those that pose no threat to people or infrastructure) during post-disturbance cleanup operations
  • Urban natural areas: Prioritizing creation of new parks
  • easements
  • or natural areas centered on areas that have biological legacies.
  • Developed urban sites: Retaining legacy trees from the pre-urban landscape during development or redesign of urban areas
  • Developed urban sites: Retaining snags within parks where they are unlikely to pose a risk to the public in order to provide wildlife habitat.

Strategy Text

Promoting species and structural diversity is as important in urban forests as in nonurbanized forest landscapes, if not more so. Urban areas are highly susceptible to introduction of nonnative pests and pathogens and often exhibit high occurrence of invasive plant species (Dreistadt et al. 1990, McKinney 2002). Urban forests have been decimated because of a lack of species diversity in the face of pest introductions (Poland and McCullough 2006, Santamour 2004). Widespread acknowledgement of this problem has led to guidelines focused on diversification of the urban forest (Santamour 2004). However, urban areas contain difficult sites, and only a limited set of tree species may be able to tolerate the conditions of many of these sites (Whitlow and Bassuk 1987). Species and structural diversity are especially important as a climate adaptation strategy because urban habitats (both natural areas and urban land uses) are likely to be stressed in the future in many ways, some of which will be unforeseeable (Gill et al. 2007, Kirshen et al. 2008). A diverse set of species, carefully selected to match the urban environment, will be more likely to maintain adequate forest cover and ecosystem services under a changing and increasingly variable climate.

Citation

Swanston C.W.; Janowiak M.K.; Brandt L.A.; Butler P.R.; Handler S.D.; Shannon P.D.; Derby Lewis A.; Hall K.; Fahey R.T.; Scott L.; Kerber A.; Miesbauer J.W.; Darling L. (2016). Forest Adaptation Resources: Climate Change Tools and Approaches for Land Managers 2nd Edition. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-87-2. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station p. http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/52775,